It's Hard to Be a Decent Human Being
- September 29th, 2009
- By Pascal
- Write comment
David Bazan’s break-up record with God has struck a chord with me (no pun intended) these last few weeks. It’s not that I find myself doubting everything about my faith, not that I want to abandon it, but I do find myself questioning a lot of things and I’m not sure how all these pieces can be reconciled.
I suppose this revolves mostly around the subject of Genesis 1-11. This semester I find myself in 2 classes which propose contrasting views of Gen 1-11, and as I find myself embracing less and less of a historical concordism with the content I wonder how that can still fit with the core tenets of the faith. Looking at Old Testament theology, and looking at the importance of the theological matter in Gen 1-11 is linked (not blatantly, but it is implied) with historical truth.
I’m not sure how I can deal with that, I’m not sure where I stand with that. I don’t know if I can affirm Genesis 1-11 as historical, literal reality. And I worry because of all the loudmouths that would say my salvation is dependent upon my belief and affirmation of a literal rendering of Gen 1-11. It’s hard to ignore those loudmouths sometimes, and it’s harder still to ignore those who aren’t so obnoxious.
Then there’s the other side of the fence… David Bazan’s honest struggle with the story of a magical fruit which explains why the living die. This ultimately leading to his current “rejection” of the faith and ultimately his “agnosticism”. This seems to be a clear rejection of a literal reading of Genesis 3, and one which an evolutionary creationist would certainly empathize with and understand. But it seems that no one gave Bazan the option to reject a literal historical interpretation while affirming the theological truth within it…
And I wonder whether or not that option should even be available. It would certainly seem easier to fully embrace young earth creationism, or to affirm some sort of deistic evolution (I don’t think I could ever bring myself to the point of seeing the world as dysteleological) but to stand between the two and affirm the theological truth within Genesis 1-11, but to reject a literal historical reading is somewhat contentious.
There are days when this doesn’t seem to be as much of an issue… but then Thursday comes… and Friday isn’t much better…
Ultimately, I have no idea what I’m saying. I have no idea what I believe. It’s hard to be a decent human being… never mind trying to fit the Christian faith in there…